USGA Executive Director Mike Davis recently met with Jack Nicklaus and what was there main topic of conversation?… Rolling the golf ball back. Jack stated, “I’m happy to help you, I’ve only been yelling at you for 40 years.” His golf course designs are fantastic, one of my favorites being The Bull at Pinehurst Farms in Sheboygan, but I very much disagree with his stance on the golf ball. New golf courses have gotten much longer, yet your average golfer isn’t gaining 10, 20 or more yards per year. The golf companies sure try to tout that with each new driver launch, every half year, you will gain more distance. But your average golfer isn’t changing physically like the players on tour now are. The era of Tiger and intense strength training, along with golf club technology, is accentuating the newer golf ball distance.
The average drive of your every day male golfer is 214 yards, with his swing speed coming in around 93 mph. The leading driver of the ball on the PGA tour is Tony Finau at an average of 327 yards with a swing speed of 124 mph. His backswing is also about as short as a 80 year old golfer. If golf’s governing bodies (USGA and R&A) were to roll back the golf ball, this would effect your daily golfer much more than your long hitting tour pros. Even across the PGA tour, you are going to continue to reward your long hitters more as they are still going to be able to reach long par fives. They might have to use a longer iron or possibly even a 3-wood, but all of your moderate and short hitters on tour are now no longer going to be able to hit that par 5 in two.
Mike Davis made the statement, “Throw Dustin (Dustin Johnson (DJ)) an 80 percent golf ball and say, ‘Let’s go play the back tees,’ and guess what, it would be a great experience for him.” If Dustin is hitting the ball 315 yards and he then uses an 80 percent golf ball and is only hitting it 252 yards. Your average male golfer at 214 yards is still significantly behind DJ and no where near the caliber of player. How is that going to be a great experience for Dustin? We would all love the opportunity to play with a PGA Tour player but there is nothing saying it makes it any less fun playing a different set of tees.
I love seeing pros shoot low scores. Even though the US Open is an amazing golf tournament, the fact that they like trying to keep the score around even par to me is not as much fun to watch. I would much rather see birdies being made versus players nearly breaking their wrists in six inch thick rough and only advancing the ball 30 yards. When you hear announcers and tournament organizers talk about normal golfers being able to relate to making a bogey, par, par, bogey, bogey… sure maybe they can relate to the overall score or barely advancing the golf ball, but its not because of the extreme conditions. Its because your average golfer is that much different than a tour pro.
Golf course architects keep talking that the only solution is to lengthen courses. But take a look at this week and last week on tour. Both Riviera and PGA National (Jack’s course) are playing at less than 7400 yards with water, bunkers, rough and narrow landing areas all keeping the long ball in check. Both of these courses could do even more to shrink down and force long hitters’ hand when putting the ball out there that far. If you look at last year’s US Open at Erin Hills, playing at around 7800 yards, Rickie Fowler, Matt Kuchar, Steve Stricker, Jim Furyk and Zach Johnson were the only players in the top 25 shooting under par (with an average drive of less than 300 yards). All of these players scored because they were in the top ten of Fairways Hit, Greens Hit or Average Putts. An 80% golf ball would have not allowed these players to reach some of the holes they were reaching, and would also have made them have to come in with a longer iron or wood most likely making them less accurate.
I am not saying that I am against golf governing bodies making a change, I just don’t think the golf ball is where it should be done.
2 thoughts on ““Roll” Back”
I agree that an 80% rollback is ridiculous. 5-7% would make more sense. Check the literature on affecting amateurs. Most of the slower swingers don’t compress the ball enough to benefit from modern tech so a rollback wouldn’t affect them. Even if it did, I would rather see a rolled back ball for tour pros only.
Also, count me out on narrower courses with more hazards and water. It takes away strategy and doesn’t force pros to think. It is ok for some tourneys, but I don’t want it to be the solution. Sure the ball is not the only way, but it is the easiest.
Thanks for your thoughts! There are a lot of different ideas being thrown around out there but not a lot of conclusive data on an 80% golf ball. I didn’t actually put any specific 80% cut back data except Dustin Johnson. If DJ were to use an 80% ball but your average golfer were to use his same ball he is currently using, he would still be significantly behind DJ. I do agree that it most likely wont effect your average golfer as much as the top drivers of the ball, however I do think it will effect them compared to the balls they are currently using. I also agree if it does happen that it should be corralled to pro tours.
There is so much talk of having to make longer courses. Clearly with Riv, PGA National and others that are short by tour standards they have their defenses and if your average player plays the right set of tees that trouble becomes less. The pros definitely have to think on those courses too. They probably don’t have to think as much at your local Muni.
Where I completely agree with Jack, is we need the fix to help address the pace of play!